nrw.social ist einer von vielen unabhängigen Mastodon-Servern, mit dem du dich im Fediverse beteiligen kannst.
Wir sind eine freundliche Mastodon Instanz aus Nordrhein-Westfalen. Ob NRW'ler oder NRW-Sympathifanten, jeder ist hier willkommen.

Serverstatistik:

2,8 Tsd.
aktive Profile

#TERMS

1 Beitrag1 Beteiligte*r0 Beiträge heute
Fortgeführter Thread

Harris backs Biden's supreme court reforms

Kamala Harris has endorsed Joe Biden’s push for supreme court reforms
that include term limits for justices,
a binding code of conduct
and a constitutional amendment to remove immunity for crimes committed by a president while in office.

“President Biden and I strongly believe that the American people must have confidence in the supreme court,” she said in a statement.

Yet today, there is a clear crisis of confidence facing the supreme court as its fairness has been called into question after numerous ethics scandals and decision after decision overturning long-standing precedent.

Harris added:

These popular reforms will help to restore confidence in the court, strengthen our democracy and ensure no one is above the law."

#immunity#terms#limited

Biden calls for supreme court reforms including 18-year justice term limits

Joe Biden has called for a series of ⭐️reforms to the US supreme court,
⭐️including the introduction of term limits for justices
and a
⭐️constitutional amendment to remove immunity for crimes committed by a president while in office.

In an op-ed published on Monday morning, the president said justices should be🔸 limited to a maximum of 18 years’ service on the court
rather than the current lifetime appointment,
and also said 🔸ethics rules should be strengthened to regulate justices’ behavior.

The call for reform comes after the supreme court ruled in early July that former presidents have some degree of #immunity from prosecution,
a decision that served as a major victory for Donald Trump amid his legal travails.

“This nation was founded on a simple yet profound principle:
⭐️No one is above the law.⭐
Not the president of the United States.
Not a justice on the Supreme Court of the United States,” Biden wrote.

“I served as a US senator for 36 years, including as chairman and ranking member of the Judiciary Committee.
I have overseen more Supreme Court nominations as senator, vice president and president than anyone living today.

“I have great respect for our institutions and separation of powers.
♦️What is happening now is not normal, ♦️and it undermines the public’s confidence in the court’s decisions,
including those impacting personal freedoms.
We now stand in a breach.”

Biden called for a
⭐️“no one is above the law” amendment⭐️ to the constitution,
which would make clear that no president is entitled to #immunity from prosecution by virtue of having served in the White House.

Biden also said justices’ #terms should be #limited to 18 years,
under a system where a new justice would be appointed to the supreme court by the serving president every two years.

The president also called for #stricter, #enforceable #rules on conduct which would require justices to disclose gifts,
refrain from political activity,
and recuse themselves from cases in which they or their spouses have financial interest.

Last week Justice Elena #Kagan called for the court to strengthen the ethics code it introduced in 2023
by adding a way to enforce it.
That code was introduced after a spate of scandals involving rightwing justices on the court:
Clarence #Thomas was found to have accepted vacations and travel from a Republican mega-donor,
while Samuel #Alito flew on a private jet owned by an influential billionaire on the way to a fishing trip.
theguardian.com/us-news/articl

The Guardian · Biden calls for supreme court reforms including 18-year justice term limitsVon Adam Gabbatt

The thing about positing something for a specific context is that you can coin a term and define it for the context. I call that "your pen, your paper".

Of course, if the term already exists elsewhere, the new definition should generally comport with the existing definition. At least it should not be wildly different from or be the opposite of the existing definition.

Fortgeführter Thread

The #filing marks the 1st ofcl confirmation of the extent of the #FTC’s initial findings of its probe into whether the co was #violating the terms of a #settlement #Twitter made to address allegations that it collected #user #data #deceptively. FTC orders are among the most critical #enforcement tools that the #federal govt has to hold #SiliconValley accountable, & Facebook in 2019 had to pay a multibillion #fine to the agency for violating the #terms of its own #privacy agreement w/the agency.