Konto erstellenAnmelden

Frühere Suchanfragen

Keine früheren Suchanfragen

Suchoptionen

Nur verfügbar, wenn angemeldet.
nrw.social ist einer von vielen unabhängigen Mastodon-Servern, mit dem du dich im Fediverse beteiligen kannst.
Wir sind eine freundliche Mastodon Instanz aus Nordrhein-Westfalen. Ob NRW'ler oder NRW-Sympathifanten, jeder ist hier willkommen.

Verwaltet von:

Serverstatistik:

2,9 Tsd.
aktive Profile

nrw.social: ÜberStatusProfilverzeichnisImpressum/Datenschutz

Mastodon: ÜberApp herunterladenTastenkombinationenQuellcode anzeigenv4.3.6

#dataprotection

40 Beiträge25 Beteiligte1 Beitrag heute
Öffentlich *
Kevin Karhan :verified:

Except THIS is not how any of this works!....

#Trump literally lashing out against friends and neighbours will only backfire hard, and I expect @EUCommission and @europarl_en to enact #PrizeFreezes for #US #products & #services whilst forcing #Retaliatory #Tariffs on all US #products and espechally #services, demanding 100%+ in all #fees, and #revenue of #GAFAMs' services and products to the point that they'll effectively cancel half their revenue that flows back.

  • Plus forcing all products and services to be processed and sold via a #EU-based #corporation and adding a 30% "#AlienTax" as the #USA already does for i.e. #App #developers that ain't from the US even if they never sold a single license to a US customer.

Not to mention cancelling any #DataProtection agreements that only stalled the foreseeable court decision that #CloudAct is incompatible with #GDPR, thus banning #Office365 / #Microsoft365, #iCloud et. al. from the EU!

Given #Trump can't be assed to even fake any #loyality or #allied status even for the cameras, this is a #ForeseeableConsequence.

Unless we want to end up #downgraded into the state of a US-occupied overseas possession without statehood, like #Guam, #PuertoRico or #AVI...

YouTubeWhy Trump's tariff chaos actually makes sense (big picture)Von Money & Macro
#USpol
Antwortete im Thread
Öffentlich
Open Rights Group

ORG's report highlighted the challenges in enforcing how UK Political Parties use our data.

We raised concerns about the privacy and security of canvassing apps used by the Parties, and raised the question of whether voters’ data is being used unlawfully.

The Data Bill risks making the situation worse by granting Ministers powers to change the rules in a way that sidesteps Parliament.

Read more ⬇️

openrightsgroup.org/publicatio

Open Rights GroupMoral Hazard: Voter Data Privacy and Politics in Election Canvassing AppsIn this report we analyse the technical architecture, and associated privacy policies, of the canvassing apps used by the Liberal Democrat, Conservative, and Labour parties during the 2024 general election.
#DataBill#DUABill#dataprotection
Fortgeführter Thread
Öffentlich
Open Rights Group

Our briefing shows how Henry VIII powers in the UK Data Bill will allow Ministers to change the law without proper Parliamentary scrutiny.

This threatens electoral integrity when the Party in office could fiddle the rules over the use of voter data at a time of their choosing, giving them an advantage – for example to allow practices that the ruling Party was ready to deploy.

Find out more ⬇️

openrightsgroup.org/publicatio

#DataBill#DUABill#dataprotection
Antwortete im Thread
Öffentlich
Open Rights Group

Data profiling by UK Political Parties can put your privacy at risk and threaten electoral integrity.

But data protection hands power back to voters ✊

ORG has developed a tool for you to opt-out of data processing by the Parties (UK).

Find out more ⬇️

action.openrightsgroup.org/opt

Open Rights GroupOpt-out of political parties processing your dataPolitical parties are hungry for sensitive personal data about your views, opinions, voting preferences and ideological outlook. Parties will actively seek to obtain this information from surveys and canvassing. They will also purchase commercially available data-sets and use automatic processing to try and predict your likely voting beliefs and intentions. Some people might be happy to volunteer this information to parties, or for political parties to purchase data about them.
#DataBill#DUABill#dataprotection
Öffentlich
Open Rights Group

ORG's joint letter with democracy/privacy groups and academics was published this week.

We warn that Henry VIII powers in the UK Data Use and Access Bill could hand a governing Party an advantage to skew elections, by changing the rules over the use of voter data.

Find out more ⬇️

openrightsgroup.org/press-rele

Open Rights GroupDemocracy groups warn of threat ‘Henry VIII’ powers pose to future election integrityDemocracy organisations, privacy groups and academics have written to government ministers to warn that powers in the Data Use and Access (DUA) Bill could threaten the integrity of future elections.
#DataBill#DUABill#dataprotection
Öffentlich
Miguel Afonso Caetano

"NEW YORK—A lawsuit seeking to stop the U.S. Office of Personnel Management (OPM) from disclosing tens of millions of Americans’ private, sensitive information to Elon Musk’s “Department of Government Efficiency” (DOGE) can continue, a federal judge ruled Thursday.

Judge Denise L. Cote of the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York partially rejected the defendants’ motion to dismiss the lawsuit, which was filed Feb. 11 on behalf of two labor unions and individual current and former government workers across the country. This decision is a victory: The court agreed that the claims that OPM illegally disclosed highly personal records of millions of people to DOGE agents can move forward with the goal of stopping that ongoing disclosure and requiring that any shared information be returned.

Cote ruled current and former federal employees "may pursue their request for injunctive relief under the APA [Administrative Procedure Act]. ... The defendants’ Kafkaesque argument to the contrary would deprive the plaintiffs of any recourse under the law."

"The complaint plausibly alleges that actions by OPM were not representative of its ordinary day-to-day operations but were, in sharp contrast to its normal procedures, illegal, rushed, and dangerous,” the judge wrote."

eff.org/press/releases/judge-r

Electronic Frontier Foundation · Judge Rejects Government’s Attempt to Dismiss EFF Lawsuit Against OPM, DOGE, and MuskNEW YORK—A lawsuit seeking to stop the U.S. Office of Personnel Management (OPM) from disclosing tens of millions of Americans’ private, sensitive information to Elon Musk’s “Department of Government Efficiency” (DOGE) can continue, a federal judge ruled Thursday. Judge Denise L. Cote of the U.S....
#USA#Musk#OPM
Antwortete im Thread
Öffentlich
Eric Maugendre

@data @datadon 🧵

In its judgment, the General Court of the European Union strengthened the conciliation and regulatory powers of the European Data Protection Board.

"The DPC will have to continue its investigations into Meta unless it chooses to refer the matter to the European Court of Justice. Given the timeline of the original investigation, which began in 2018, it may still take several years before a final determination is made regarding the GDPR compliance of Meta’s business model, particularly in relation to behavioural advertising."

dpoblog.eu/cjeu-and-the-powers by Christina Etteldorf, Institut of European #Media #Law, Saarbrücken (Germany)

dpoblog.euCJEU and the Powers of EDPB – DPOblog
#advertising#GDPR#Meta
Öffentlich
MediaFaro News Digest

TikTok faces a €500m fine over EU data illegally sent to China.

TikTok’s parent company ByteDance is reportedly set to be hit with a fine of over €500 million for illegally shipping European user data to China.

The fine could be one of the largest handed down by Ireland’s Data Protection Commission, TikTok’s main European regulator.

mediafaro.org/article/20250403

The TikTok logo on a smartphone. | Copyright AP Photo/Michael Dwyer, File
Euronews · TikTok faces a €500m fine over EU data illegally sent to China.Von Euronews
#EU#DataProtection#TikTok
Öffentlich *
WERNERPRISE° — Thomas Werner

🇩🇪 Eine Bitte an die Community: Benutzt keine URL-Shortener, die dann zu Datensaugern führen, also YouTube/Google, FB/Insta, Twitter, TikTok etc.

Schon der reine Aufruf einer solchen Site bedeutet Datenspionage.

Danke.

🇬🇧 Dear Community, may I ask you not to use URL shorteners that point to data-grabbing commercial websites like YouTube/Google, FB/Insta, Twitter, TikTok etc.?

Simply accessing such websites leads to data mining.

Thank you.

#SocialMedia#YouTube#Google
Öffentlich
Miguel Afonso Caetano

Sweden just isn't what it used to be...

"In most countries, the government knows when you were born, your social security number, where you live, how much you earn and how much your house is worth. Sweden is a bit different though. There, the tax authority doesn’t just use this information for administrative purposes – but sells it to data brokers who publish it online. This is a violation of EU law. Earlier this year, a Swedish data subject asked the country’s tax authority to stop selling his data. The country’s Supreme Court has recently ruled that freedom of information and privacy rights must be balanced and data must be marked as confidential, if the recipient is likely to process it in conflict with the GDPR. The tax authority rejected the request, claiming it simply follows the Swedish constitutional principle of transparency rather than the ruling by the Supreme Court. noyb now takes the authority to court."

noyb.eu/en/noyb-takes-swedish-

noyb.eunoyb takes Swedish tax authority to court for selling people’s personal dataIn Sweden, the tax authority doesn’t just use people's personal information for administrative purposes – but sells it to data brokers who publish it online.
#Sweden#EU#Taxes
Öffentlich
Open Terms Archive

👥 Highlights from the April #CommunityCall!

Thank you to the 8 community members who called in to talk about dating apps, tracked by Marie-Pierre Vidonne in the #Dating Collection, and about ways to improve internal processes for maintainers and contributors.

📅 Save the date: Join our next #CommunityCall on May 7th !

#DigitalCommons #Transparency #TechForGood #DatingApps #SafetyPolicy #DataProtection

@MattiSG @clementbiron

A screenshot of the 8 participants in Open Terms Archive's April Community Call. From top left to bottom right: Matti, Clément, Kim, Marie-Pierre, Noémie, Sydney, Zenobio, Nicolas.
Fortgeführter Thread
Öffentlich
Open Rights Group

The Data Bill strips back your right to human review of automated decisions that have life-changing impacts.

It flips the script, forcing you to prove a mistake has been made when AI gets it wrong – the scales of justice further imbalanced.

Sign our petition ⬇️

you.38degrees.org.uk/petitions

38 DegreesAI says NO: Tell Keir Starmer that people, not machines should oversee life-changing decisionsClause 80 of the Government’s Data (Use and Access) Bill could strip away your right to decide whether people or machines make decisions that impact our lives. Big Tech and Whitehall are eager to cut costs by using AI algorithms to make crucial decisions about you. Soon, computers—not people—could determine the outcome of your benefit claims, job applications, or mortgage approvals. Right now, UK GDPR protects your right not to be simply subjected to life-changing decisions made solely by...
#DataBill#DUABill#dataprotection
EntdeckenLive-Feeds
Über