nrw.social ist einer von vielen unabhängigen Mastodon-Servern, mit dem du dich im Fediverse beteiligen kannst.
Wir sind eine freundliche Mastodon Instanz aus Nordrhein-Westfalen. Ob NRW'ler oder NRW-Sympathifanten, jeder ist hier willkommen.

Serverstatistik:

2,8 Tsd.
aktive Profile

#bias

3 Beiträge3 Beteiligte0 Beiträge heute

At least #Perplexity got one thing right:

-----
Multiple
#independent #investigations and #leaked #internal #data confirm that #SocialMedia platforms—especially #Meta (#Facebook and #Instagram)—have engaged in #widespread, #systematic #censorship of #pro-Palestinian #content, often in direct response to #Israeli #government #requests[1][2][3][4][6][7]. This censorship has resulted in the #removal, #suppression, or #shadowbanning of tens of thousands of #posts and #accounts, with a disproportionate impact on users from Arab and Muslim-majority countries, but also affecting users worldwide[2][3][4][6].

Key points from the evidence:

- Meta has complied with 94% of Israeli government takedown requests since October 7, 2023, resulting in over 90,000 immediate removals and the suppression of millions more posts through automated systems[2][3][4][6].
- The vast majority of these requests targeted
#content #critical of #Israel or #supportive of #Palestinians, and only a tiny fraction targeted Israeli users[3][6].
-
#HumanRightsWatch and other NGOs have documented this as a #global, #systemic pattern of #censorship, not isolated incidents[1][5][7].
- There is no comparable evidence of systematic censorship or suspension for users expressing pro-Israeli views; the
#documented #bias overwhelmingly targets pro-Palestinian speech[1][2][3][4][5][6][7].

In summary, the documented reality is that pro-Palestinian views are aggressively censored on major social media sites, while pro-Israeli views do not face the same level of moderation or suppression. This creates a significant imbalance in the digital public sphere[1][2][3][4][6][7].

Citations:
[1]
https://www.hrw.org/report/2023/12/21/metas-broken-promises/systemic-censorship-palestine-content-instagram-and
[2]
https://www.dropsitenews.com/p/leaked-data-israeli-censorship-meta
[3]
https://www.jewishvoiceforlabour.org.uk/article/social-media-platforms-remove-pro-palestinian-posts/
[4]
https://www.palestinechronicle.com/crackdown-on-pro-palestinian-content-meta-deletes-over-90000-posts-at-israels-requests/
[5]
https://www.euronews.com/next/2024/10/07/human-rights-ngos-say-social-media-platforms-continue-to-censor-pro-palestine-content
[6]
https://7amleh.org/post/meta-must-end-the-systematic-censorship-of-palestinian-content-globally
[7]
https://www.hrw.org/news/2023/12/20/meta-systemic-censorship-palestine-content
[8]
https://www.un.org/unispal/document/ngo-action-news-17-april-2025/
[9]
https://features.csis.org/gaza-through-whose-lens/index.html
[10]
https://www.aljazeera.com/features/2023/10/24/shadowbanning-are-social-media-giants-censoring-pro-palestine-voices
[11]
https://www.iemed.org/publication/the-gaza-war-coverage-the-role-of-social-media-vs-mainstream-media/

---
Answer from Perplexity: pplx.ai/share

@israel@a.gup.pe @palestine@a.gup.pe @gaza@a.gup.pe

202312mena_ip_meta_covergraphic
Human Rights Watch · Meta’s Broken PromisesThe 51-page report, “Meta’s Broken Promises: Systemic Censorship of Palestine Content on Instagram and Facebook,” documents a pattern of undue removal and suppression of protected speech including peaceful expression in support of Palestine and public debate about Palestinian human rights. Human Rights Watch found that the problem stems from flawed Meta policies and their inconsistent and erroneous implementation, overreliance on automated tools to moderate content, and undue government influence over content removals.

What can be done about "the rich?" The rich effect \ influence is generally negative on communities. E.g., undermining democracy, using up far more resources than the average person. Privatisation & private Jets, monopolist mindsets, etc

The super rich are “hoovering up” #Norfolk land

eastangliabylines.co.uk/farmin

> Italian counts, Dubai royals, and German heirs now own swathes of Norfolk. Family farms can’t compete

#UK#Economics#money

#abc730 #auspol #bias Sarah Ferguson just displayed her clear bias by inviting "Well Done Angus" to close the debate between the Treasurer and Shadow Treasurer to make his case for why he should be Treasurer (after giving him much more freedom during the debate).

Despite the fact that he ABC has an equal time policy, she then invited the Treasurer to make his case "in half the time".

What the actual fuck?

#KINews #Retröt
Nach einigen Monaten Wartezeit habe ich nochmals DALL-E via #ChatGPT mit einigen Stichproben geprüft, wie es mit dem #Bias in der KI-#Bildgenerierung von Personen und Berufsbildern aussieht. Ich habe wieder dieselben Beispiele wie Ende des Jahres 2023 genommen, erweitert um zusätzliche Berufe.

#KI #Stereotype #Klischees #Geschlechtersterotype #Geschlechterklischees #Trainingsdaten #KIModelle

tino-eberl.de/ki-news/chatgpt-

Tino Eberl · ChatGPT 4 vs. 4o: Geschlechterklischees in der Bildgenerierung
Mehr von Tino Eberl

“The BBC gave nearly 60% of its coverage to just ONE pro-assisted suicide lobby group”

by Hannah Sharland in The Canary @thecanaryuk @BBC5Live
@BBCRadio4

“When it comes to BBC coverage of assisted suicide – or anything, really – the foremost UK public broadcaster should rebrand itself the British Bias Corporation and be done with it”

thecanary.co/uk/analysis/2025/

Canary · The BBC gave nearly 60% of its coverage to just ONE pro-assisted suicide lobby groupFar from platforming a range of voices in the assisted suicide debate, the BBC has actually just been platforming one: Dignity in Dying
#Press#UK#BBC

I am reading a peer-reviewed article that describes a study that featured 5 drivers; 4 male, 1 female. It includes the following analysis:

"It shows that male is more impulsive and daring in operating their vehicles by 22% than a female who is more hesitant and less daring, which is consistent with the physiological nature of women."

Do I reject all further findings or?